Unit Author: K. Anne Pyburn, Indiana University
Structural Violence
Description
Structural violence is a type of oppression that is difficult to see. It is usually easy to see that people are being harmed, but the reason for the harm, and the causes of the harm are often almost invisible, because they lie in the ways resources are distributed, not necessarily in the resources themselves. For example, people who live in rural areas, or in economically challenged urban areas may not have access to a good variety of healthy foods because distributors don’t believe certain foods will sell or because knowing there is no competition, they can still profit if they offer only poor-quality goods. People who shop in these “food deserts” may not know that they are not getting the variety offered to people in other places or realize that their food choices are unhealthy. Frequently people who are stuck in such situations get blamed by outsiders for choosing a poor diet.
Another example is school funding. If local taxes are used to fund schools, schools in areas where people are poor will get less support from taxes. These schools will have less resources (e.g., fewer computers and less lab equipment and shop tools), more crowded classrooms, less qualified teachers (better qualified teachers can get jobs in neighborhoods where the salary is better), etc. Of course, there are exceptions to this, but in general, poorer neighborhoods have poorer schools. The result is that children from poorer families get a poorer education and have little chance to use their education to improve their economic status. As with food deserts, people who are subject to poor educational opportunities are often blamed for not valuing education by people who live in areas with fewer disadvantages where more equipment and better teachers make school more engaging.
In both of these cases, the cause of the lack of good foods and good schools is unclear, and the disadvantage of poorer nutrition and poorer schooling may not seem like “violence,” but in reality, these unfair conditions have as much impact on people’s lives as physical violence. Poor nutrition results in physical shortcomings and affects learning ability in children and stamina in adults. Poorer educational backgrounds restrict access to better jobs and higher education. The people who decide where to send certain types of food and how to draw the boundaries around a taxation precinct are creating the “structure” that causes the problems, but they may not even realize the repercussions of their choices or take any responsibility for them.
Learning Goals
Students will become aware of some aspects of “normal” experience as specific to particular income groups, some cultural groups, and some localities. They will also become aware that resource distribution both results in and is caused by human decisions that can be identified, evaluated and regulated. The underlying causes of will be demystified and students will be encouraged to participate in responsible political engagement in their communities.
Reading Lists
Background List for Instructors
Galtung, Johan. "Violence, Peace, and Peace Research" Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 6, No. 3 (1969), pp. 167-191
Joshua Inwood, Derek Alderman, Melanie Barron. "Addressing structural violence through US reconciliation commissions: The case study of Greensboro, NC and Detroit, MI." Political Geography, Vol. 52 (2016), pp. 57-64.
List for Students
"Structural Violence [8:12]" from Rdot V. YouTube.
Lecture, Activity, Assessment
Lecture
Structural violence explains how a scientific pursuit resulted in depriving people of the remains of their ancestors. Archaeologists did not feel responsible for doing violence to living people by studying the dead. In this class it should become clear how archaeologists did not see themselves as having privileged access to cultural property in the same way that grocery store owners do not see themselves as depriving people by only offering what will make them the best profits.
Johan Galtung introduced in the term Structural violence in the article "Violence, Peace, and Peace Research" (1969) to describe social structures or social institutions that hurt people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structural_violence elaborates on Galtung’s idea and you can either summarize it or assign it as a reading to the class.
Show "Faces of Structural Violence | Max Bocksch | Berlin ZDAY 2015" from TZMOfficialChannel in class:
Summarize the Inwood, Alderman, and Barron article that suggests a way of addressing structural violence. Make the connection to NAGPRA as a kind or reconciliation, though perhaps not a satisfactory one.
Activity and Assessment Ideas
Have students move into conversational groups and identify a form of structural violence that they have experienced. Once a particular experience is identified, ask them to answer the following questions:
- What is the cause of the structural violence? Is there an organization or a law or an individual that bears some responsibility for the problem? If you are not sure, how would you go about finding out?
- How might the problem be addressed? To answer this, you will need to first identify what the positive affect of the institution or the practice is, for example, the grocery store that only sells processed foods needs to make a profit or they will go out of business; the school district that has too few computers cannot decide to give up having heat in the winter.
- Each group should write the experience, the cause and the solution down very briefly to hand in at the end of class. For the next class, you can use these ideas to expand on the difficulties associated with eradicating structural violence, but be sure to end with a discussion of agency so that the class is not left with a sense of helplessness.